tBlog - Taboo Monkey Blue Blog: Writing on Writing

Introduction: Care to Revise Your Story?

Taboo's critical literary discussions about Ernest Hemingway, Hermann Hesse, T.S. Eliot, Flannery O'Connor, Franz Kafka, and many other authors. Links to full story texts and critical discussions.


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 June
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 October
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 November
2005 October
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December

My Links
Home
TaBoo's Ezine Navigator
The Greatest Maze
Sudoku Tips and Tricks
Joe User
The Phallic Suggestion

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Introduction: Care to Revise Your Story?
02.06.07 (5:45 pm)   [edit]

Jump into:

1. Part II: Care to Revise Your Story? Opening Windows
2. Novel Workshop: Testing Your Idea

You have seven notebooks and two hard drives loaded with story beginnings. You write and write. You write some more. You have ideas galore, characters aplenty, and those first two paragraphs are positively brilliant--because you revise, revise, and revise them over and over again, always trying to forget that you need to finish the goldang story. It's easy to call these paragraph nitpickings by the name "revision." It makes you feel productive. Nearly.

And then you finish a draft. Hallelujah! Now what?

Taboo Story RevisionSnip, snip. Get those scissors ready.

Step One: Drink a bottle of wine.

Step Two: Take a walk.

Step Three: Think about something else for five days. Think about anything else. But DO NOT look at your story! Let it have some alone time.

All right, take some deep breaths and let's get back to work.

Of every ten stories Raymond Carver wrote, eight went to the garbage can, one took a slight detour by way of a draft or two before joining its fellows in the trash, and one story made the cut.

Literally.

STORY REVISION

I am lousy at revision. When I revise a story, my revision becomes an entirely different piece of fiction. That's not revision. That's laziness. Your story needs to change, but don't fool yourself into thinking that you're ready to move on to the next piece.

I'm taking a story revision course with Pam Painter. She has a book on the task I'm about to outline and I highly recommend sniffing out a copy for yourself. Meanwhile, get out your scissors, scotch tape and highlighter. Hold on to something. Here we go:

Story Revision: Slicing Your Story into Scenes

Every story can be cut into different scenes, sections of narrative summary, flashbacks and back story. Number each of your sliced sections and then tape them (be ready to pull them down--no super glue) on the wall near your computer, behind the couch where you write your madness into notebooks--wherever you like, just make sure you can pace back and forth with enough elbow room to pull out your hair. Do not fiddle with language. Don't get fussy about clichés right now. Save it for a later revision.

What you have in front of you is the plot, or the narrative. Between the both of you, you and your narrator have chosen to tell your story in this particular order, whether or not the order corresponds with the chronology of the story itself. Why does Jimmy have a flashback in section seven? Why does Lucy Lu decide to narrate some back story in section twelve--back story that takes place chronologically before the story begins? There's nothing necessarily wrong with narrating a chronologically diverse story, but you'd better have a nifty reason for doing it that way.

Story Revision: Mixing the Scenes

Okay. Look at each scene and note when crucial bits of information show up, when major characters are introduced and other relevant details. Make sure that readers are getting all the important parts of the story when they need them. You may understand your character well enough to know why he decides to stuff his sister's mouth with caterpillars, but readers won't understand unless you show them. It might seem obvious to you that eighteen year old Billy wets his pants, but unless you tell your reader that Billy is, in fact, eighteen years old, wears big boy pants, and drinks five liters of Gatorade before going to sleep, the reader will think Billy is a little toddler who wears those rubber pant-protectors. Share your information with your readers, people!

With your story cut up into sections, you'll have an easier time seeing your omissions. And more importantly, you'll have to face the hard truth that some of your precious scenes will need eliminating. What's your story about? What is your character trying to do? If your scene doesn't help your character get from one place to another, you've got to kiss that scene goodbye. There's just no other way. Don't believe me? Think about it this way: YOU may know what your story is about, and YOU may understand that the funny little jewel of a scene in section four is there because it's hilarious and deserves to be served to the public. But your reader trusts that everything in your story is essential. If they believe your scene is essential and then discover that it isn't, they're going to put your story down and go read something that makes sense.

To recap:

1. Cut your story into sections, number them and hang them on the wall to dry
2. Inspect each section for crucial details, and make a note to yourself that your reader will receive a bit of info in scene two or scene fifteen.
3. Does your reader know what you know? More importantly, do you know enough about your own story?
4. Make sure every scene counts. Does each scene lead relentlessly to the conclusion? If you were the reader instead of the writer, would you ask, "Why doesn't Billy simply put down the Gatorade?" If the reader would ask such as a question, you should replace that silly scene about the circus peanuts with a scene about Compulsive Electrolyte Disorder. Make your scenes count, or get rid of them.

Now, make a note of your revised section order, complete with added scenes and notes concerning your deleted scenes. TYPE YOUR REVISED STORY. Do not cut and paste. Do not cut and paste. Do not cut and paste.

Whoo-hoo. My professor says I have a second draft! (Pats self on back).

Jump into:

1. Part II: Care to Revise Your Story? Opening Windows
2. Novel Workshop: Testing Your Idea

Copyright ©2004-2006, ©2007 Joshua Suchman. All rights reserved.
Taboo Monkey Blue Blog

 


posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 02.06.07 (3:47 pm)

I will not cut and paste...


This was a great post!

Come to think of it, I do cut, but I never paste - unless it's within the same sentence or paragraph where I find I've decided to run a sentence on too long and I feel it needs to be reordered to make more sense to the reader, though I make sure I never do it with sections of a story; just run-on sentences like this one which reminds me of something I've always wondered; should "run-on" be hyphenated or is it two distinct words?



posted by: tabootenente (reply)
post date: 02.06.07 (6:53 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

Thank. You. Surrogate (periods. pasted. into. sentence.).

and, for the record, run-on is a singular holy word that we writers of glorious fiction like to flourish in the collective faces of nonfiction editors.

taboo



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 02.10.07 (7:12 am)

So what do you do when you're writing something and it takes on a life of its own. Changes from what you'd planned almost entirely... Do you go back to what you'd planned or let the thing evolve on its own?



posted by: tabootenente (reply)
post date: 02.10.07 (9:38 am)

Reply to: surrogate

tough question. i talked about it a little in my new post, but no matter how you look at it, a story's evolution becomes a dilemma during revision.

i think good writers find the answer by understanding their story's central question. my professor loves to ask, "into what life has this trouble come?" if a writer understands the story he is writing, he understands that character well enough to know what the character was like before the trouble comes rumbling forth (into what life), and also understands why this particular trouble forces the old dog of a character to change.

that's the story. if after a few revisions you don't really know why this trouble affects this character, you'll need to let the story fade away until the real story emerges. that's not revision, though--that's writing a new story.

here's my own rookie's perspective: you can't really revise a story--you revise the narrative. either you have a story, or you haven't found it yet. if you have one, the next step is to revise, revise, and revise some more until you're TELLING that story in the way it needs to be told. if you don't have a story, the revision process will let you know the hard truth, and revision becomes a way of starting a new story.

taboo



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 02.10.07 (2:37 pm)

Reply to: tabootenente

Well, actually, I wasn't talking about a revision. I mean, right from the get go, when the story takes a radical turn that's come to you as you write, is it wise to let it go that way and see what happens? Or is it better to slowly pump the brakes and get things back under control, forgetting about the fork the car itself wanted to follow. I think I'm wondering if you believe there can be inspiration contained in spontaneity...




posted by: tabootenente (reply)
post date: 02.11.07 (7:34 am)

Reply to: surrogate

hmm, an even more searching question than the other, this question of spontaneity--especially when you first sit down and write a story.

stephen koch, the one-time director of columbia university's writing program, said, "how can you know your story until you've told it?" i agree with him. that half-formed, resinous idea that you're trying to identify when writing needs expression before the story takes shape. if you already know the story, then you probably do not need to tell it.

f. scott. fitzgerald said, "character is plot," and i agree with this too, to a certain extent. your character is the life into which trouble comes (to use professor pam painter's line again), and your character's desires shape his responses, his responses define the action, and that action is the story. you are the writer, and it's your job to box your character into a corner until he must act. but plot comes from the narrative, the telling, not from the story. your spontaneity is how you express the story of your character's life; your spontaneity is NOT how your character responds. when you first tell the story, the spontaneous crap you throw at him will help you learn who your character is and what he will do.

similarly, henry james said, "character is action." aristotle said, "character is fate." in the end, character is the story. but the text itself, and its ordering--how you tell that story--shows who YOU are, why you're writing THIS story. i think the process, or the writing of the story itself, is more important than the story. after all, there are no new stories. but the way we tell them--that's the heart of Being.

taboo



Your Name:


Your Comment: